THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING
Editor's Pick (1 - 4 of 8)

We need to talk about inhouse property and facilities systems
Rodney Timm, Director, Property Beyond Pty Ltd


Rodney Timm, Director, Property Beyond Pty Ltd
This is a long and arduous process that will cost much more than the initial estimate, take significant management time and likely never meet the initial system expectations. There are many examples of millions of dollars have been spent on these journeys, most often without the systems ever being switched on.
• Do not dictate that service providers are to use bespoke in-house property and facilities systems in which they have not been trained. Industry service providers invest significant dollars into their systems, in which their teams are trained, as part of their core business models. Tender pricing advantages are derived from industry participants having scalable best-of-breed systems to support their suite of services.
MATCHING EXPECTATIONS AND BUDGETS
There are a number of other systems decisions that need to be made to ensure that expectations are managed and aligned to the budget available. Examples of how to keep systems budgets in control include:
• Be realistic in expectations of your information management needs. Only upload data that is essential and will make a difference to the operational management and planning. The temptation, excited by the data manipulation capacity of the systems, is to collect too much data. Remember that most data will need to be uploaded and manipulated by people – an expensive resource.
• Limit customization of the proprietary industry or service provider systems under consideration. Requiring modifications to suit your own property processes (or habits) that have evolved over many years may not be the best outcome. Industry systems are generally designed to meet ‘best practice’ – so rather change the internal process to suit the system than the other way around – these industry practices usually work the best.
• Think carefully about the need for seamless or real-time transfer of data between different systems. Systems analysts will promise that this can be done via many different file formats. The reality is that data mapping and uploading always seems to come up with surprises. Be prudent and transfer data at aggregated levels and at set daily intervals, rather than attempting to transfer all data fields in real-time.
DECISIONS THAT MAKE SYSTEMS WORK
With systems planning, there are some ‘leaps of faith’ to be made at key implementation decision thresholds. Successful systems implementation is enhanced by the following key steps:
• Determine how the property and facilities dollars will flow, be managed and controlled within the organization, very early in the journey. For example, most property systems have good general ledger functions, but if the finance department insists that all payments will be made through the company’s general ledger, embed this decision into the systems discussions at the onset.
• Be prepared to let go of your data. Unless the portfolio data is top secret, transfer the responsibility (but not ownership) for data management to your service provider to populate the data, make it available and to report accordingly. There are control mechanisms that can be incorporated into the service contract to safeguard the data. Online and regular reporting requirements will provide comfort that the data is up-to-date, accessible, and safe.
• During the transition, portfolio data can usually be uploaded from the existing databases to the new system being implemented. But ensure that there is an obligation that all data needs to be verified against source documentation, and this is priced accordingly, to ensure that there is data integrity in the new system.
• Do some parallel runs. The best way to test the portfolio data integrity in a new system is having both systems and processes, old and new, to operate in parallel for a couple of month ends.
In conclusion, the key to having systems implemented within budget and time-frames is managing your expectations and demands. A more complex system that requires more customization will result in greater cost and time to implement. Simpler systems using defined processes, even if these do not replicate current processes, will cost less and present fewer challenges to implement.
Don’t be paranoid about releasing data – this happens in most other corporate e disciplines. And remember that systems are the core capabilities and the backbone of most facilities and property management service providers – use these to your advantage.
See More: Top Facility Management Companies
Weekly Brief
I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info
Read Also
New Hr Capabilities To Face Evolving Technologies
Anti Deisnasari, Director Of Compliance, Seabank Indonesia
Strengthening The Compliance Fortress In The Banking Sector
Chuan Lim Ang, Managing Director And Sg Head Of Compliance, Cimb
Navigating Legal Challenges By Adapting To Technological Shifts
Valerie Feria Amante, Chief Legal, Ethics & Compliance Officer, Jollibee Group Of Companies
Compliance In The Medtech Industry
Tomoko Chantelle Kondo, Head Of Legal & Compliance, Arthrex Japan
How Can The American Trade Finance Companies Manage Present (And Future?) Chinese Mineral Export Control Measures?
Thomas Lagriffoul, Regional Director Of Compliance Apac, Thomas Lagriffoul Coface
Optimizing Customer Experiences Through Data-Driven Strategies
Indra Hidayatullah, Information Technology Operation Division Head, Pt. Bank Tabungan Negara
Customer-Oriented And Compliance Mindsets In Claims Management
Alex Lee Li Haojun, Group Claims Manager – Insurance, Mapletree
Optimizing Business Efficiency with a Multi-Disciplinary Legal Operations Team
Shulin Tay,Head Of Legal And Compliance - Singapore, Revolut
